{"id":10292,"date":"2014-05-08T00:03:20","date_gmt":"2014-05-07T21:03:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=10292"},"modified":"2020-09-15T12:32:16","modified_gmt":"2020-09-15T09:32:16","slug":"15-08-03","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/15-08-03\/","title":{"rendered":"03. Someone Sick with a Life-Threatening Illness"},"content":{"rendered":"
Someone for whom fasting is liable to cause death has a mitzva to eat and drink as needed, since saving life overrides the mitzva of fasting \u2013 and all mitzvot<\/em> in the Torah \u2013 as we read, \u201cYou shall keep My laws and My rules, by the pursuit of which man shall live; I am the Lord\u201d (Vayikra 18:5). Our Sages infer: \u201c\u2018By which man shall live\u2019 \u2013 and not die\u201d (Yoma<\/em> 85b). The mitzvot<\/em> were given to promote life, not to cause death (Peninei Halakha: Shabbat<\/em> 27:1 n. 1). If one is uncertain whether his life is in danger but is \u201cstringent\u201d and does not eat and drink, he is a sinner, as he violated the Torah\u2019s commandment to preserve his life. Of him, the Torah says (Bereishit 9:5), \u201cBut for your own life-blood I will require a reckoning\u201d (Bava Kama<\/em> 91b).<\/p>\n Permission to eat is not limited to cases of grave danger. Rather, as long as there is a chance that fasting will cause a person\u2019s death or weaken his ability to fight off an illness that afflicts him, it is a mitzva for him to eat and drink as needed. Even if someone is already gravely ill, if fasting will likely hasten his death, it is a mitzva for him to eat and drink as necessary, for it is permitted to eat and drink on Yom Kippur even to extend life temporarily.<\/p>\n On the other hand, this should not be taken too far by worrying about remote concerns, for if we were to view every routine illness as possibly life-threatening, it would render moot the halakha <\/em>that someone sick is obligated to fast on Yom Kippur. Furthermore, anyone with the flu would need to be hospitalized, or at least have a doctor check on him twice a day. Were we really to worry about such levels of risk, we would have to forbid travel by car or plane. Certainly, we would have to prohibit cars that have not passed inspection within the last month. We would also have to prohibit hiking and many other activities.<\/p>\n Rather, the principle is that any danger that people normally treat with urgency and on which they spend time and resources \u2013 like rushing someone to the hospital in the middle of a workday \u2013 is considered life-threatening. To prevent such danger, it is a mitzva to desecrate Shabbat and to eat and drink on Yom Kippur. However, a danger that people do not normally address immediately with the expenditure of time and resources is not considered life-threatening.[4]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n