{"id":12004,"date":"2026-07-05T00:08:51","date_gmt":"2026-07-04T21:08:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=12004"},"modified":"2026-08-03T14:45:45","modified_gmt":"2026-08-03T11:45:45","slug":"17-05-08","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/17-05-08\/","title":{"rendered":"08. Avoiding Sha\u2019atnez in Practice"},"content":{"rendered":"
The overwhelming majority of garments sold today raise no concern of sha\u2019atnez<\/em>, since they are made from synthetic materials or cotton. Thus, if a garment\u2019s label states that its main material is synthetic, cotton, or any other fiber that is neither wool nor linen, there is no need for concern. In rare cases, such a garment may have a wool or linen ornament or be sewn with linen thread; in even rarer cases, it may contain both linen thread and a wool ornament. This possibility is so remote that it may be disregarded. Moreover, according to most authorities, no prohibition applies unless the wool and linen are joined to one another (above, 6). One should therefore read the label, and if it does not list wool or linen, there is no concern of sha\u2019atnez<\/em>.<\/p>\n For wool and linen garments as well, it is sufficient for the buyer to examine the label. If it states that the garment is made of wool or linen together with other materials, but does not list both wool and linen, the garment does not require testing. Labels are sometimes inaccurate, either because manufacturers are not required to list wool or linen content of only one or two percent, or because, on rare occasions, the wrong label is attached to a garment. In practice, however, as long as the label does not state that the garment contains both wool and linen, the likelihood that it contains sha\u2019atnez<\/em> is far below a mi\u2019ut ha-matzui<\/em> \u2013 a frequency common enough to require concern \u2013 and it need not be tested. The same is true of ordinary wool suits and coats, since the possibility that linen has been added is too remote to warrant concern.<\/p>\n Very expensive wool suits and coats, however, require greater caution. Some are hand-sewn with linen thread, reinforced around the collar or buttons with sturdy linen fabric, or fitted with linen interfacing in the shoulders and chest. Since linen is found in a mi\u2019ut ha-matzui<\/em> of such garments, any very expensive wool suit or coat must be tested. It is likewise proper to test a linen suit, since wool may have been used in its collar.<\/p>\n At a sha\u2019atnez<\/em> laboratory, garments are examined under a microscope, enabling trained specialists to identify wool, linen, and other fibers by their distinctive structures. As a rule, these laboratories take into account even the stringent views of individual authorities, both in defining sha\u2019atnez<\/em> and in determining when testing is required.<\/p>\n The rules discussed above apply to individual buyers. Clothing retailers, however, must take greater care to avoid exposing the public to sha\u2019atnez<\/em>. Whenever their experience with the merchandise gives them some reason to suspect that a shipment of wool or linen garments may contain sha\u2019atnez<\/em>, they should send a representative sample for testing, even if the likelihood is below a mi\u2019ut ha-matzui<\/em>. If the sample contains no sha\u2019atnez<\/em>, the remaining garments in that line need not be tested. When their experience provides no basis for concern, no testing is necessary; when the concern is substantial, as with expensive suits and coats, the entire shipment should be tested.<\/p>\n Buyers should preferably purchase wool or linen garments from God-fearing retailers who take care not to expose their customers to sha\u2019atnez<\/em>. Nevertheless, when such garments are purchased from an ordinary store, only especially expensive wool suits and coats and linen suits require testing.[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n