{"id":5497,"date":"2011-03-04T03:05:22","date_gmt":"2011-03-04T01:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=5497"},"modified":"2021-03-15T13:00:51","modified_gmt":"2021-03-15T11:00:51","slug":"04-03-05","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/04-03-05\/","title":{"rendered":"05.\u00a0The Essence of the Mitzva"},"content":{"rendered":"
A fundamental question arose concerning the essence of the mitzva of removing the \u1e25ametz<\/strong>: is the mitzva essentially to eliminate the \u1e25ametz <\/strong>actively or is the main principle that no \u1e25ametz <\/strong>remains in a Jew\u2019s possession?<\/p>\n According to most Rishonim (Ramban, Maharik, and others), the mitzva is primarily that one\u2019s domain be free of \u1e25ametz<\/strong>. One who has \u1e25ametz<\/strong> must clear it out, and one who has no \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in his possession has fulfilled the mitzva by having no \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in his domain.<\/p>\n However, some Rishonim (Tosafot<\/strong>, Ran) imply that only someone who has \u1e25ametz<\/strong> becomes obliged to fulfill the mitzva, and he fulfills it by clearing the \u1e25ametz<\/strong> out of his house. One who has no \u1e25ametz<\/strong> is exempt from the mitzva. Yet even according to this approach, we do not find that the Rishonim recommended acquiring \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in order to fulfill the mitzva of removing the \u1e25ametz<\/strong>. Nevertheless, there are A\u1e25aronim who wrote that it is appropriate for one who has no \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in his possession before Pesa\u1e25 to go beyond the letter of the law and buy some \u1e25ametz<\/strong>, so that he may fulfill the mitzva of removing the \u1e25ametz<\/strong> according to those who hold that one must actively remove \u1e25ametz<\/strong>.<\/p>\n In practice, Jews are a holy people and strive to enhance the mitzva by making sure they have \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in their possession on the 14th of Nisan, with which they fulfill the mitzva of eliminating \u1e25ametz<\/strong> in a manner that satisfies all views. Moreover, they are so scrupulous as to remove the \u1e25ametz<\/strong> specifically by burning it, for, according to many poskim<\/strong>, burning is the preferred way to destroy the \u1e25ametz<\/strong> (see below, 5:4).[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n