{"id":7914,"date":"2016-01-26T04:00:50","date_gmt":"2016-01-26T02:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=7914"},"modified":"2016-08-07T16:48:41","modified_gmt":"2016-08-07T13:48:41","slug":"01-26-04","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/01-26-04\/","title":{"rendered":"04. Benefiting from an Action That Did Not Alter an Item"},"content":{"rendered":"
Some say that if a melakha<\/em> did not physically alter an object, like if it was transported from a public domain to a private domain, the item does not become prohibited, and one may benefit from it on Shabbat in the private domain (Rabbeinu Yona and Ritva). The same would apply to food that was transported via motor vehicle on Shabbat; since the food itself underwent no change, it would not be prohibited. However, others maintain that there is no difference between types of melakhot<\/em> (Tosafot<\/em>, Ramban, and Rashba). Even if the melakha<\/em> did not alter the food at all, one may not benefit from it on Shabbat if it was transported in a prohibited fashion. In practice, le-khat\u0125ila<\/em> it is proper to be stringent, but under pressing circumstances one may rely on those who are lenient, particularly if the melakha<\/em> was done unknowingly.[6]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n If a melakha<\/em> that was performed on Shabbat enables an additional, permissible action to occur, one may benefit from the permissible action. For example, if a hammer was fixed on Shabbat, it may not be used, even for permitted purposes like cracking nuts. However, if one violated this prohibition and cracked nuts with the hammer, he may benefit from the nuts, since the act of cracking the nuts is not intrinsically forbidden.<\/p>\n If a locked door was unlocked in a forbidden fashion, such as with the use of an electronic key card, some say that one may not enter the room through that opening, since the door was unlocked in a prohibited fashion. Others maintain that one may enter, since unlocking the door did not create anything new; it simply removed an impediment to entering. Be-di\u2019avad<\/em>, in a time of need, one may be lenient. If a refrigerator door was opened and the refrigerator light went on, one may remove food from the refrigerator (see above, 17:9).<\/p>\n If a Jew who does not observe Shabbat approached an automatic door and thus caused it to open, one may not enter through it. Only under pressing circumstances may one be lenient. If another Jew passed by and unintentionally caused the door to open, one may enter through it (see above, 17:11).[7]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n