{"id":8148,"date":"2016-02-02T00:08:02","date_gmt":"2016-02-01T22:08:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=8148"},"modified":"2018-05-24T12:25:07","modified_gmt":"2018-05-24T09:25:07","slug":"03-02-08","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/03-02-08\/","title":{"rendered":"08. Are Women Permitted to Recite Blessings on Time-Bound Mitzvot?"},"content":{"rendered":"
A woman who wishes to voluntarily fulfill the positive time-bound mitzvot<\/em> receives reward for doing so, although it is not the same as a man\u2019s reward. As R. \u0124anina states, \u201cGreater is the [reward for] one who is commanded to do and does than one who is not commanded and does\u201d (Kiddushin<\/em> 31a). Ritva explains that the reason for this is that one who is commanded to perform a mitzva encounters the resistance of his; therefore his reward is greater, as the Sages say, \u201clefum tza\u2019ara agra<\/em>\u201d (according to the torment is the reward) (m. Avot<\/em> 5:23).<\/p>\n However, the Rishonim disagree about whether a woman may recite a berakha <\/em>on positive time-bound mitzvot<\/em>. According to Rambam and several other Rishonim, women are forbidden to do so, for included in the berakha<\/em> are the words, \u201cWho has sanctified us in His mitzvot<\/em> and commanded us\u201d (\u201casher kideshanu be-mitzvotav ve-tzivanu<\/em>\u201d). How can women say \u201ccommanded us\u201d (\u201cve-tzivanu<\/em>\u201d) when they were not commanded? Would this not be a needles berakha <\/em>(berakha le-vatala<\/em>)? SA 589:6 rules against reciting a berakha<\/em>, and this is the widespread practice among Sephardim.<\/p>\n However, according to Rabbeinu Tam and most Rishonim, women may recite berakhot <\/em>on positive time-bound mitzvot<\/em>, for indeed, to a certain extent, those mitzvot<\/em> pertain to them as well, as evidenced by the fact that they receive reward for fulfilling them. Regarding the phrasing of the berakha<\/em>, there is no concern, because the word in the berakha<\/em> is not \u201cve-tzivani<\/em> (\u201ccommanded me,\u201d in the singular), rather \u201cve-tzivanu<\/em>\u201d (\u201ccommanded us,\u201d in the plural), referring to the entire Jewish people, of which women are part. They may therefore praise and thank God for sanctifying Israel through this mitzva. Rema rules accordingly, and this is the practice among Ashkenazim. 1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n Time-dependent b<\/em>erakhot<\/em> of praise and thanksgiving, like the berakhot<\/em> of Pesukei De-zimra<\/em> and Birkhot<\/em> Keri\u2019at Shema<\/em>, may even be recited by Sephardic women, since they do not contain the word \u201cve-tzivanu<\/em>,\u201d and indeed there is a mitzva for them to recite these berakhot<\/em>. Nevertheless, R. Ovadia Yosef maintains that according to Sephardic custom women are not permitted to recite these berakhot<\/em> because they are exempt from the recitation of those passages of prayer. He therefore asserts that in schools where both Ashkenazic and Sephardic girls study, it is the teachers\u2019 obligation to instruct the Sephardic girls not to recite the conclusion of Birkhot<\/em> Pesukei De-zimra<\/em> and Birkhot <\/em>Keri\u2019at Shema<\/em>. Still, the opinion of many poskim<\/em> is that even according to the Sephardic custom it is permissible and even a mitzva for women to recite the Pesukei De-zimra<\/em> blessings and Birkhot Keri\u2019at Shema <\/em>since they are berakhot<\/em> of praise and thanksgiving. This is the common practice, so teachers need not instruct Sephardic girls to practice differently than their Ashkenazic peers, especially when such a thing will lead to confusion in the classroom. 2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n In practice, SA (589:6), which tends to rule leniently in cases of uncertainty concerning a berakha, states that women must not recite these berakhot, whereas Rema ruled, based on the prevalent Ashkenazic custom, that women do recite a berakha. Even though SA teaches not to recite berakhot on these mitzvot, many Sephardic poskim write, based on prevailing practice, that women do recite berakhot on positive time-bound mitzvot. So state \u0124ida and Zekhor Le-Avraham (cited by Kaf Ha-\u0125ayim 17:4 and 589:23), and Rav Pe\u2019alim, Sod Yesharim 1:12 regarding the berakha on shaking the lulav. This is also how the family of R. Ovadia Hadaya practiced. R. Messas (Shemesh U-magen 2:72:3) writes in Morocco the custom was that women did not recite these berakhot, but a Sephardic woman whose custom was to recite them may continue in her practice. In Ye\u0125aveh Da\u2019at 1:68 and Yabi\u2019a Omer 1:39-42 and 5:43, R. Ovadia Yosef strongly reinforces the Sephardic custom not to bless and even mentions that there are Ashkenazic poskim who teach not to recite the blessing, among them \u0124akham Zvi and Divrei \u0124ayim. In conclusion, every ethnic group should continue to follow its own custom until this matter is resolved by the Sanhedrin, which will be established, with God\u2019s help, speedily in our time. ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n It is my humble opinion that as a general rule, in a place in which people from all different ethnic communities live together, when there is difference between the different customs of the different ethnic groups, each ethnic group should be instructed to practice according to its own custom, rather than having everyone follow the opinion of the majority of poskim. However, when within one ethnic group the law is settled and in the other there is disagreement, it is best that everyone practices according to the majority, so as not to increase conflict among the Jewish people. ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A woman who wishes to voluntarily fulfill the positive time-bound mitzvot receives reward for doing so, although it is not the same as a man\u2019s reward. As R. \u0124anina states, \u201cGreater is the [reward for] one who is commanded to do and does than one who is not commanded and does\u201d (Kiddushin 31a). Ritva explains […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[106],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-03-02"],"yoast_head":"\n\n