{"id":9689,"date":"2014-09-06T08:00:43","date_gmt":"2014-09-06T05:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=9689"},"modified":"2019-11-21T13:30:09","modified_gmt":"2019-11-21T11:30:09","slug":"14-06-08","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/14-06-08\/","title":{"rendered":"08. Permission Not to Divorce"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Sages\u2019 obligation for a man to divorce his wife after ten childless years can be very painful. Some men, including Torah scholars, despite their desire to fulfill the mitzva of procreation, found it very difficult to divorce their beloved wives, with whom they had entered into an eternal covenant. They sought ways to permit their marriages to continue. Indeed, there are several grounds that sometimes permit this.<\/p>\n
The most straightforward grounds for permission are when the husband believes himself to be the cause of their childlessness, or that there is at least a reasonable chance that he is the cause \u2013 for example, if he is sickly, or if an accident may have rendered him infertile. Even in these cases, if his wife wants a divorce in order to have a child, he is required to divorce her.<\/p>\n
When it is impossible to claim that the husband is infertile, other justifications are sometimes sought. Some assert that since halakha<\/em> does not require a person to spend more than a fifth of his assets on the fulfillment of a positive commandment (Rema 656:1), if the ketuba<\/em> payment is more than this he is not obligated to divorce her (see Bigdei Kehuna<\/em>, EH \u00a71.) However, it seems that poskim<\/em> do not rely on this claim. Rather, they require the husband to divorce his wife and pay her ketuba<\/em>, because the mitzva of procreation is so important that one must spend more than a fifth of his assets in order to fulfill it (Avnei Nezer<\/em> EH 1:1). Moreover, the cap of one-fifth may apply only when an exorbitant price is being demanded for a mitzva. If the price demanded is the accepted price of the mitzva, one is obligated to pay it (see BHL 656, s.v \u201cafilu\u201d). Nonetheless, perhaps one can say that the obligation to divorce is the general rule, but if someone is especially attached to his wife, to the extent that the pain of divorce seems terrible, above and beyond the norm, and worse than losing most of his assets, he is not obligated to divorce his wife.<\/p>\n When the amount of the ketuba<\/em> payment is more than the husband can afford, some say that he cannot divorce his wife (Rashba; Pri \u1e24adash<\/em>). Many others maintain that since the divorce is halakhically required, if the husband is unable to pay the entire amount of the ketuba<\/em> he pays as much as he can, and the beit din<\/em> sets up a payment plan for the remaining amount. The divorce, however, is not delayed (Responsa Radbaz<\/em> 1:458; Get Mekushar<\/em> 119:18; Yaskil Avdi<\/em>, vol. 2, Kuntres A\u1e25aron<\/em>, EH \u00a71; Yabi\u2019a Omer<\/em>, EH 7:2:10).<\/p>\n Outside of Eretz Yisrael, some wish to rely on the few Rishonim who maintain that even after ten years there, it is unnecessary to get divorced.[9]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n In practice, in each and every case, all factors are considered, and usually, by combining two or more rationales, justification is found to keep them together.<\/p>\n Another claim that can be used to allow a childless couple to remain married is for the woman to refuse to accept a get<\/em>. The man can then claim that Rabbeinu Gershom\u2019s ban forbids him from divorcing her against her will. (Technically, if he insists on marrying another woman, he might be permitted to take a second wife; if he does not insist, he would simply remain married to the current wife.) However, this is be-di\u2019avad<\/em> because it is based on the wife\u2019s refusal to uphold halakha<\/em>.[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n