{"id":9702,"date":"2014-09-07T05:00:53","date_gmt":"2014-09-07T02:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/?p=9702"},"modified":"2019-11-21T13:39:28","modified_gmt":"2019-11-21T11:39:28","slug":"14-07-05","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ph.yhb.org.il\/en\/14-07-05\/","title":{"rendered":"05. The Prohibition on Female Sterilization"},"content":{"rendered":"
The prohibition of sterilization applies to women as well as men, but sterilizing a woman is a rabbinic prohibition rather than a Torah one. The Torah prohibits male castration, as it says, \u201cYou shall not offer to the Lord anything [with its testes] bruised or crushed or torn or cut. You shall have no such practices in your land\u201d (Vayikra 22:24). All these actions damage the male reproductive organs, which are external, and not the female reproductive organs, which are internal. Similarly, the prohibition of a saris<\/em> to marry applies only to a man who has been sterilized, as the verse states, \u201cNo one whose testes are crushed or whose penis is cut off shall be admitted into the congregation of the Lord\u201d (Devarim 23:2). Clearly, this refers to a man. In contrast, a woman who has been sterilized is allowed to marry freely. Nevertheless, from the standpoint of the mitzva of procreation, a man who has not yet fulfilled his obligation may not marry an infertile woman.<\/p>\n The rabbinic prohibition of female sterilization is limited to cases where this is done directly, either through physical trauma or surgery. However, indirect sterilization, such as by drinking an infertility potion, is permitted. Even this indirect sterilization, though, is permitted only when truly necessary to sterilize her, such as if she has extremely difficult labor, or if her children turned out poorly and she is afraid to bring more children into the world, and accepted methods of birth control are not viable options for her (above, 5:17-19). However, when there is no particular reason, infertility may not be caused even indirectly, as there is a general prohibition on wantonly destroying anything in God\u2019s world (bal tash\u1e25it<\/em>; Devarim 20:19). Certainly, then, one may not destroy a woman\u2019s ability to have children.<\/p>\n Permission for a woman to undergo sterilization is also contingent upon her husband\u2019s consent, because in agreeing to marry him she committed to be his full partner in the mitzva of procreation (\u1e24atam Sofer<\/em>, EH \u00a720; above 5:14; see also 5:6).[7]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n In recent years, the issue has arisen of sterilizing a woman by tubal ligation, a procedure, colloquially called \u201cgetting one\u2019s tubes tied,\u201d in which the fallopian tubes (through which the egg travels from the ovaries to the uterus, where it can be fertilized) are cut, tied, or blocked, preventing the eggs from reaching the uterus, making pregnancy impossible. The question is whether a woman who experiences difficult pregnancies and does not want any more children may ask her doctor to sterilize her via tubal ligation. Some say that tubal ligation is like drinking a sterility potion, since the sterilization is not visible externally (Si\u2019a\u1e25 Na\u1e25um<\/em> \u00a7100). Additionally, this type of sterilization is not irreversible; sometimes the tubes can be surgically repaired. Even if the reversal procedure does not work, it is still possible to extract an egg from the ovary and do IVF. Others say that since ligation is an act of sterilization performed on the reproductive organs themselves, it is rabbinically prohibited. Thus, as long as it is possible for a woman to take birth control pills or have an IUD inserted, tubal ligation is prohibited (Igrot Moshe<\/em> EH 4:33-34 and 4:32:1). Today there is a procedure that blocks the fallopian tubes indirectly. This is permitted even according to the stringent opinion.[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n