04 –  Seed Kilayim and Vineyard Kilayim

01. The Prohibition Against Seed Kilayim

The Torah prohibits sowing two types of seed together in a field in Eretz Yisrael. Each type must be sown on its own, as it says: “You shall keep My statutes… You shall not sow your field with kilayim” (Vayikra 19:19). The word kilayim means “mixture.” This prohibition includes edible grains, legumes, and vegetables. Plant species grown for ornamentation or medicine, however, are not included.

The prohibition against seed kilayim applies to annual crops: grain, legumes, and vegetables. There is no prohibition against planting different species of trees together, nor against planting trees together with an annual crop. Even when trees are intermingled, their size makes it clear that each tree has its own distinct place. The annual crops planted among them likewise have their own place, since trees grow upward and their roots spread far outward, leaving room for the annual crop to grow among them.

One who waters, fertilizes, weeds, or otherwise assists the growth of kilayim violates a Torah prohibition punishable by lashes. Even when kilayim grew on its own in his field, as long as he wants them there – or it appears as though he wants them there – he must uproot them, for one may not maintain kilayim in one’s field (MT, Laws of Kilayim 1:1–3).

If one deliberately sowed kilayim, the produce may nevertheless be eaten. The prohibition is against sowing and cultivating kilayim; eating what grows from them is not prohibited (MT, Laws of Kilayim 1:7). Only with vineyard kilayim does the resulting produce become forbidden to eat.

The prohibition against seed kilayim applies in Eretz Yisrael. Even on land owned by a gentile, a Jew may not sow kilayim. In the Diaspora, however, a Jew may sow seed kilayim, because the verse speaks of “your field,” and only Eretz Yisrael is considered “your field” for this purpose. The Sages did not prohibit seed kilayim there either; they prohibited only vineyard kilayim in the Diaspora, because it is more severe: one may neither eat its produce nor derive benefit from it (see below, section 7).

In Eretz Yisrael, it is also prohibited to sow two species together in a pot. If the pot is perforated, it is considered connected to the ground, and the prohibition applies by Torah law. If it is not perforated, it is detached from the ground, and the prohibition is rabbinic.[1]


[1]. One who sows kilayim or performs an act that promotes their growth is liable to lashes. If the plants grew on their own and he wants them to remain, then for as long as he leaves them in place without uprooting them, he violates a Torah prohibition; however, he is not liable to lashes, because lashes are imposed only when a prohibition is violated through an action (Yerushalmi, Kilayim 8:1). This is the view of almost all Rishonim and most Aḥaronim. Some maintain that even this case is prohibited only rabbinically (Vilna Gaon; Ḥazon Ish).

According to most authorities, the Torah prohibition applies when the seeds are sown be-mapolat yad, meaning that the two types of seed are cast by hand together. This includes any act that promotes their joint growth, such as covering them with soil, watering, fertilizing, or weeding (Tosafot; Rash; Vilna Gaon; and others). Some are stricter and maintain that one who sows one species beside another violates a Torah prohibition even if he does not later tend them together (Kaftor Va-Feraḥ; Mishna Rishona). Even today, kilayim is prohibited by Torah law within the territory settled by those who came up from Egypt (see below, 12:2, note 2).

Crops grown as animal fodder together with crops grown for human consumption constitute kilayim. However, all types of animal fodder are treated as a single species, so sowing different kinds of fodder together is not kilayim (Kesef Mishneh; Taz; and others). Some maintain that animal fodder is not subject to the prohibition against kilayim at all, even when sown together with crops grown for human consumption (Radbaz; Mishpat Kohen 26). Others maintain that any plant grown as a full field crop, such as cotton, is subject to kilayim when sown together with food crops, even though it is not itself grown for human consumption (Mabit). Some maintain that the prohibition against kilayim applies by Torah law even indoors (Yeshu’ot Malko 1:1; Ḥazon Ish), while others hold that it applies only rabbinically (Mishpat Kohen 49; Eretz Ḥemda, pp. 21–22). In a greenhouse, however, it appears to apply by Torah law, since that is a standard way to grow such plants.

02. The Concern of Marit Ayin in Seed Kilayim

By Torah law, seed kilayim is prohibited when a person sows two species together or willingly maintains them together. If they grew in his field without his wanting them, he has not violated a Torah prohibition. Nevertheless, because of marit ayin, the appearance of wrongdoing, the Sages prohibited a field owner from leaving kilayim in his field even when he does not want them there. Since the field is open and visible to all, passersby may think that the owner does not care about observing the mitzvot, and this would desecrate God’s name.

Therefore, if one wants to sow his field with wheat and finds that barley seeds have become mixed in with the wheat, he may do so only if the barley remains below a certain threshold. If the barley is not enough to produce one twenty-fourth of the field’s yield – 1/24, or 4.16% – he may sow the mixture as it is. With such a small amount, there is no concern for marit ayin, since anyone who sees the field will understand that the barley is growing there against the owner’s will.

Although one may not intentionally sow even a single barley seed in a wheat field, this applies only when the barley was deliberately added. If one intentionally mixed even one barley seed into the wheat, he may not sow the wheat unless he first removes the barley seed. If, however, the barley became mixed in unintentionally, he does not want it there, and removing it would be burdensome, he may sow the mixture as it is, provided the barley is less than one twenty-fourth of what will grow in the field. At such a small proportion, there is no concern for marit ayin, since anyone who sees the field will understand that the barley is growing there against the owner’s will. If the barley is enough to produce one twenty-fourth of the field’s yield, he must either reduce the barley or add wheat until he is certain that the barley will produce less than one twenty-fourth of the growth in the field.

The same rule governs a field that was sown with one species and later has another species growing alongside it. The determining factor is whether he wants the second species to remain. If he does, the mixture is kilayim, and he must uproot the second species entirely. If he does not want it there, and it makes up less than one twenty-fourth of the field’s growth, he need not reduce it. If it reaches one twenty-fourth, he must reduce it until it is less than that amount.[2]

Because this mitzva is important and those who violate it cause a grave desecration of God’s name, every year on Rosh Ḥodesh Adar, when grain and vegetables were beginning to sprout, the agents of the beit din would urge the Jewish people to be careful about kilayim (Mishna, Shekalim 1:1).

On the fifteenth of Adar, the agents of the beit din would inspect the fields. If they found kilayim, they would uproot the minority species and place it before the owner’s animals. The field owners benefited twice: their fields were weeded, and their animals were fed. They therefore stopped bothering to remove the kilayim themselves. The Sages then enacted that the agents would uproot the kilayim and leave it on the roads, where any animal could eat it. Still, because the field owners were happy that their fields had been weeded, they did not bother to uproot the kilayim. When even this did not solve the problem, since owners still benefited from the weeding, the Sages enacted that the agents of the beit din would declare everything growing in any field where kilayim was found ownerless. From then on, field owners took care to avoid kilayim (Mo’ed Katan 6b). Once the agents of the beit din declared the kilayim ownerless, the field owner no longer violated the prohibition because of it, since the prohibition against maintaining kilayim does not apply to ownerless growth.


[2]. Mishna, Kilayim 2:1; MT, Laws of Kilayim 2:1–10. Some maintain that because the field owner does not want the minority species to remain, it is nullified in the majority by Torah law. Nevertheless, because of marit ayin, the Sages prohibited sowing or maintaining the minority species once it amounts to 1/24, as observers may think that he mixed it in intentionally. When the minority species is less than 1/24, however, there is no concern for marit ayin. People do not normally mix in such a small amount intentionally; on the contrary, an amount that small is generally understood to have become mixed in by accident (Rash; Rosh; R. Ovadia of Bartenura; R. Shlomo Sirilio).

Others maintain that once the minority species amounts to 1/24, maintaining the mixed planting is prohibited by Torah law even when the owner does not want the minority species there. In their view, the Torah prohibition itself is appearance-based: at that proportion, it looks as though he wants kilayim in his field. This is how most commentators understand Rambam’s view. Nor do we say that the minority species is nullified in the majority, for nullification applies only when one component stands in halakhic opposition to the other, such as forbidden food mixed with permitted food. Here, by contrast, both species are permitted in themselves, so one is not nullified in the other. Moreover, a recognizable minority is not nullified. When it is clear to all that he does not want the second species to remain, such as when it is known to be harmful, he need not reduce it even if it reaches 1/24.

03. The Required Separations for Seed Kilayim

The basic principle in the laws of seed kilayim is that two species may be planted near one another when they remain visibly distinct, but not when they appear mixed together. The larger the field, the greater the required separation, so that the distinction between the species remains recognizable. The required separation also depends on the density, size, and length of the plants’ leaves: grain, whose stalks grow tall, requires a greater separation, while vegetables generally require a smaller one, except for vegetables with especially large leaves.

Vegetables: By Torah law, one must leave one tefaḥ – approximately 8 cm – between one vegetable species and another. The Sages extended the required separation to one and a half tefaḥim – approximately 12 cm. If that distance was left between the two species, there is no prohibition against kilayim even if their branches later grow until they touch, since the stems emerging from the ground remain properly separated. There are a few exceptions, such as gourds, whose leaves are especially large and tend to intertwine with neighboring species. In such cases, one must ensure that the leaves of the two species do not touch. These rules apply to beds in a garden. Two vegetable fields, however, must be separated by a square area one ama by one ama – approximately half a meter by half a meter. Along the rest of the boundary between the fields, it is proper to leave a gap of one tefaḥ.[3]

Grain: Since grain is normally sown over large areas, greater separation is required. By Torah law, the required distance is one ama. The Sages, however, ruled that this distance is adequate only for small plantings less than one ama wide. For grain sown in medium-sized plots, known as a meishar, whose width is at least one ama, the separating area must begin with a square of two amot by two amot – approximately one meter by one meter – and may then taper diagonally, as illustrated below, until only a minimal gap remains between the fields.

 

 

When grain is sown in large fields, as is usual, the required separation is a beit rova, a square of about five meters by five meters. Along the rest of the boundary, it is proper to leave a one-ama gap running the length of the two fields.[4]

Authorities disagree whether legumes are treated like grain or like vegetables. Therefore, one must leave one ama between the two plantings, regardless of the field’s size.[5] When grain is sown next to vegetables or legumes, or vegetables are sown next to legumes, the required separations are more complex and depend on the size of the field. In any case, the requirement is no stricter than for grain.

If a partition ten tefaḥim high – approximately 80 cm – stands between two fields, no further separation is needed. This is true even of a reed partition, provided that no gap between reeds exceeds three tefaḥim; the partition itself separates the fields. Even if the roots of the two species are known to intertwine underground, there is no kilayim prohibition so long as the partition creates a visible separation. Similarly, a road four amot wide – about 1.84 meters – or a plowed strip of the same width separates the fields, so the large five-by-five-meter beit rova separation is not required.


[3]. According to most Rishonim and Aḥaronim, one tefaḥ suffices by Torah law to separate vegetables, but the rabbinic requirement is one and a half tefaḥim. This is the view of R. Ḥananel, Rambam, Rash, Rosh, R. Ovadia of Bartenura, Kaftor Va-Feraḥ, SA YD 297:34, and others. Others maintain that the rabbinic requirement is three tefaḥim (Rashi; Rabbeinu Tam; Ritva). According to the Vilna Gaon, it is six tefaḥim. Still others maintain that even rabbinically, one tefaḥ suffices (Geonim; R. Sa’adia Gaon).

A garden bed for which a separation of one and a half tefaḥim suffices is one that is no more than one ama long – six tefaḥim, or about half a meter. A field, by contrast, requires a separation of one square ama. According to Ḥazon Ish, this category begins with an area of a beit rova, about 22 square meters – 10.2 amot by 10.2 amot. According to R. Yisraeli, it begins only with a beit tish’a kabin, about 780 square meters. If the planted area is larger than a garden bed but smaller than a field, Ḥazon Ish requires either a separation of one and a half tefaḥim or a furrow one tefaḥ deep and one tefaḥ wide. According to R. Yisraeli, however, a furrow is always required. According to Rash, the furrow must run along the entire planted area. According to Rambam, the furrow need only run for six tefaḥim; after that, a gap of one tefaḥ is sufficient.

The precise measurements are as follows: one tefaḥ is 7.6 cm; one ama – six tefaḥim – is 45.6 cm; and a beit rova is ten and one-fifth amot by ten and one-fifth amot, or 4.65 meters by 4.65 meters (Peninei Halakha: Sukkot 2, note 1). SA YD 296:68 explains that with respect to kilayim, these measurements should be expanded and calculated as generous measures of tefaḥ and ama. Therefore, in the practical measurements given above, we rounded upward: a tefaḥ to 8 cm, following R. Ḥayim Na’eh’s measure, and an ama to half a meter.

[4]. Field: As explained in the previous note regarding vegetables, the minimum size of a “field” is about 22 square meters according to Ḥazon Ish, and about 780 square meters according to R. Yisraeli; the latter view appears correct. The Yerushalmi states (Kilayim 2:4) that for a meishar – a small grain field more than one ama wide – the separation between two meisharim is a square of two amot by two amot, after which it tapers diagonally until only the smallest gap remains.

Ḥazon Ish and Tiferet Yisrael disagree over whether this same diagonal tapering is required after the other square separations as well: the one-ama square between vegetable fields, and the beit rova – roughly ten amot by ten amot – between grain fields. According to Ḥazon Ish (Kilayim 6:1:1), after the square, the separation must continue diagonally until it narrows to a minimal gap; beyond that, no further separation is needed. According to Tiferet Yisrael (Kilayim 2:73), the square separation itself is sufficient, and once it ends, the two species may be planted immediately next to one another.

My teacher, R. Yisraeli, held that Tiferet Yisrael’s view is the primary law. Nevertheless, in practice, it is proper to leave the separation required by Torah law along the entire length of the field: one tefaḥ between vegetable species and one ama between grain species. This also appears correct in practice, since the basic principle of seed kilayim is that the species must remain visibly separated from one another.

[5]. According to my teacher, R. Yisraeli, legumes are governed by the laws of vegetables, but even where vegetables require only one and a half tefaḥim, legumes require a furrow (Eretz Ḥemda, pp. 85, 144–149). According to Ḥazon Ish, legumes are governed by the laws of grain (Kilayim 6:2; 8:2), so out of concern for the Torah-law requirement, one must be stringent and leave one ama even in small areas. In large fields, however, one ama suffices: this is the Torah-law separation, and doubts about the additional rabbinic separation are ruled leniently (Hilkhot ha-Aretz, Kilayim 5:14).

04. Vineyard Kilayim: A Distinct and Stricter Prohibition

Although vineyard kilayim can be viewed as a particular case of seed kilayim, in practice it has halakhot of its own. This shows most vividly in the produce. Seed kilayim prohibits the sowing, but the crops that grow may still be eaten and used; what grows from vineyard kilayim, by contrast, is forbidden to eat and even to derive benefit from.

One may not sow grain or vegetables alongside grapevines, nor may one plant a grapevine alongside grain or vegetables. If one did so, both crops become forbidden; one may neither eat them nor derive benefit from them, as it says: “You shall not sow your vineyard with kilayim, lest the full yield – the seed you sow and the produce of the vineyard – become consecrated” (Devarim 22:9). In this context, tikdash means that the produce is consecrated for destruction – forbidden for any benefit. “The full yield of the seed you sow” refers to the grain or vegetable, while “the produce of the vineyard” refers to the grapes. Even the grain’s straw and the vines’ wood become forbidden; they must be burned or otherwise destroyed so that no one mistakenly benefits from them (see above, chapter 2, note 3). Because one may not derive benefit from them even as they are being destroyed, one may not burn them to heat an oven or stove (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:7). The prohibition of vineyard kilayim applies by Torah law in Eretz Yisrael and by rabbinic law in the Diaspora (see below, section 7).

By Torah law, the prohibition of vineyard kilayim applies when grapevines grow alongside the five grain species, legumes, or vegetables. It does not apply, however, to tree species, even small ones. As a rule, any plant whose berakha is ha-etz is not included in the prohibition of vineyard kilayim, while any plant whose berakha is ha-adama is included (see above, 2:8).

This includes spices over which ha-adama is not recited in practice, since they are not eaten on their own (Peninei Halakha: Berakhot 8:14). If they are plant species whose berakha would be ha-adama if they were eaten on their own, they are included in the prohibition of vineyard kilayim.

The Sages also extended the prohibition to grasses and vegetables commonly used as animal fodder. Plants that are not commonly fed even to animals are not included in the prohibition (Levush YD 296:2).

Authorities disagree about plants grown for fragrance. Some authorities prohibit them rabbinically, while others permit them. In practice, it is best to be stringent, but one who wishes to be lenient may do so. Ornamental plants, by contrast, are not prohibited. Therefore, one may plant grass and flowers beneath a grapevine, provided they are not commonly fed to animals, even if they also have medicinal uses.[6]


[6]. Regarding liability for lashes, the Amora’im disagree (Yerushalmi, Kilayim 8:1). According to R. Yonatan, one who sows a single species of grain or vegetables in a vineyard is liable for lashes. According to R. Yoshiya, since the verse says, “You shall not sow your vineyard with kilayim” (Devarim 22:9), the Torah refers specifically to seeds that would already constitute kilayim even without the vineyard. In the Bavli (Berakhot 22a; Kiddushin 39a), only R. Yoshiya’s view is cited: one is liable for lashes when he sows wheat and barley together with a grape seed that will grow into a vine, or even when he merely covers them with earth. He is therefore liable twice: once for seed kilayim and once for vineyard kilayim.

Rambam rules accordingly with regard to liability for lashes (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:1–2). At the same time, he maintains that the Torah prohibition itself is broader: one may not sow even one species of grain or vegetables next to a grapevine, nor may one plant a grapevine next to grain or vegetables. For that act, one is not liable for lashes; nevertheless, the produce that grows from it is forbidden by Torah law, and one who eats an olive-bulk of it is liable for lashes (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:7; MT, Laws of Forbidden Foods 10:6). This is also the view of Yere’im and Radvaz to MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:7.

According to Ramban and Ran, the Torah prohibition applies when one sows two species beside an already planted grapevine; sowing only one species there is permitted. According to Ramah and Sefer ha-Ḥinukh, sowing even one species beside a grapevine is rabbinically prohibited. Rabbeinu Tam and Ri are more lenient: once the grapevine has already been planted, one may sow even two or more species beside it. In their view, R. Yoshiya’s statement does not merely define when one is liable for lashes; it defines the prohibition itself. Thus, vineyard kilayim is prohibited only when two seed species are sown together with a grape seed. The halakha follows Rambam, as ruled in SA YD 296:3, Levush, and Arukh ha-Shulḥan YD 296:13.

All types of grain, legumes, and vegetables grown for human consumption are prohibited in a vineyard by Torah law. Plants grown as animal fodder are prohibited rabbinically. As the Mishna explains (Mishna, Kilayim 5:8), one who maintains in a vineyard thorns that are commonly fed to animals renders the vineyard forbidden. By contrast, iris, ivy, and king’s lily, which are not commonly fed to animals, do not constitute vineyard kilayim. This is how Levush summarizes the law (YD 296:2), and this is also a possible reading of Rambam (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:3, 6, 19; Kesef Mishneh to MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:3).

A different view maintains that, by Torah law, only grain, hemp, and luf are prohibited in a vineyard, because only these species are mentioned in the Talmud: grain because of its importance, and hemp and luf because they resemble vines or grow alongside vines for three years. According to this view, other legumes and vegetables eaten by people or animals are prohibited rabbinically (Rabbeinu Tam; Tosafot, Yevamot 83a, s.v. R. Yosi; Smag; Rashba). Even within this approach, there are further distinctions. For example, some authorities maintain that since legumes resemble grain, they too have the status of grain and are prohibited by Torah law (Maharitatz, in his understanding of Rambam; similarly, the commentary attributed to Rashba, Menaḥot 15b). Since the prohibition applies to vegetables grown for food, it also includes vegetables used as spices.

Authorities disagree about plants whose berakha is borei isvei vesamim. Some authorities permit planting them near grapevines (Ḥazon Ish, Kilayim 1:14; Mishpetei Eretz 2:1). This permissive view may be supported further by Rabbeinu Tam and Ri, who maintain that there is no prohibition at all unless two species are sown together with a grape seed in a single act of sowing. Moreover, if only one species is planted near the vine, even Ramban and Ran agree that there is no prohibition. Still, many authorities imply that planting fragrant plants near grapevines is rabbinically prohibited, and SA YD 108:7 rules this way (see Kedushat ha-Aretz 5:7). As for ornamental plants, such as flowers and grass, some authorities are stringent and prohibit them rabbinically because they are fit for animals (R. Eliyahu). The overwhelming majority of authorities, however, permit them.

05. When the Produce Becomes Forbidden

The prohibition of vineyard kilayim includes not only sowing the forbidden mixture but also maintaining it (Mishna, Kilayim 8:1). Thus, even if a person did not sow grain in his vineyard, if even a single grain stalk grows there, he must act quickly to destroy it, because one may not maintain kilayim in a vineyard.

Sowing and maintaining differ, however, in when the produce becomes forbidden. If one sows a grain stalk in his vineyard, the stalk and the surrounding vines become forbidden for benefit as soon as it takes root. If, however, one merely finds a grain stalk that grew in his vineyard, it and the vines become forbidden for benefit only if it continues to grow by one part in two hundred. Nevertheless, he must destroy it immediately, because even one who is negligent and maintains it for even a moment violates the prohibition (Mishna, Kilayim 5:6; Pesaḥim 25a; MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:21–22; 6:1).[7]

When do the vines become forbidden for benefit? Only when grapes are present on the vines and are still growing and ripening. This period begins when the grapes reach the boser stage, meaning that their form is recognizable and they are at least the size of a white bean, and it continues until the grapes are fully ripe. If there are no grapes in the vineyard, or if the grapes have either not yet reached the size of a white bean or have already fully ripened, grain or vegetables growing nearby do not render the vines forbidden for benefit. The grain or vegetables themselves, however, do become forbidden.

When does the grain become forbidden? From the time it takes root in the ground until the kernels fully ripen. Therefore, if the grain has already finished ripening and a vine bearing grapes at the forbidden stage is bent over it, the entire vine becomes forbidden, but the grain does not become forbidden (Mishna, Kilayim 7:7).[8]

If the wind bent a person’s vine over his grain, he must separate them immediately. If there is concern that they will become mixed again, he must cut the vine branches or erect a fence to prevent it from happening again. If he was negligent and they remained mixed until one of the two increased by one part in two hundred, they become forbidden. If, however, circumstances beyond his control kept him from separating them in time, they do not become forbidden (Mishna, Kilayim 7:7; R. Yitzḥak b. Malki Tzedek and R. Shimshon to Mishna, Kilayim 7:7; MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:11; Kesef Mishneh and Mahari Kurkus to MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:11).

A person cannot render someone else’s property forbidden. Therefore, if one caused his vine to spread over another person’s grain, his vine becomes forbidden, but the other person’s grain remains permitted. If he caused another person’s vine to spread over his own grain, his grain becomes forbidden, but the other person’s vine remains permitted. If he caused one person’s vine to spread over another person’s grain, both remain permitted. However, as soon as the owner of either the vine or the grain becomes aware of the kilayim, he must act quickly to separate them. If he is negligent until one of them increases by one part in two hundred, his own portion also becomes forbidden.

The person who actively mixed the kilayim by hand is treated more stringently: for him, even property that is not his becomes forbidden. Moreover, if a person passes by another person’s vineyard, sees grain stalks growing there, and knows that the owner wants them to remain, he must uproot them. Similarly, a worker employed there must uproot the kilayim. If they do not do so, the vine and grain that grew there become forbidden to them for benefit. The vineyard owner, however, has not violated the prohibition. Only once he learns of the kilayim must he act quickly to uproot the grain stalks. If he is then negligent and they continue growing by one part in two hundred, they become forbidden to him and to all Jews (Mishna, Kilayim 7:4; MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:8–9, 21; Taz YD 296:3).


[7]. Maran Rav Kook explains that, according to Rambam, once vineyard kilayim grows by one part in two hundred, the resulting prohibition is by Torah law. The Torah forbade cultivating vineyard kilayim but left it to the Sages to define how much growth gives that mixture halakhic significance. They established the measure at one part in two hundred (Mishpat Kohen 24). Yere’im §389 writes similarly, and this also seems to be the view of Sefer ha-Ḥinukh §549.

Other authorities disagree. In their view, Torah law forbids the produce only when most of its growth occurred as kilayim. The Sages then prohibited it once it had increased by one part in two hundred (Kiryat Sefer, Laws of Kilayim ch. 5; Minḥat Ḥinukh §549; Derekh Emuna 5:146). In any event, when the vineyard owner does not want the kilayim to remain, the prohibition appears to be rabbinic and based on marit ayin. This is similar to the law of seed kilayim discussed above, 4:2, where a minority species of less than 1/24 does not create a prohibition (Derekh Emuna 5:141).

In earlier times, one would destroy grain or vegetables that grew in a vineyard by uprooting them. It seems that today one may also destroy them by spraying them with herbicide. Even if several days pass before they die, since they are already in the process of being destroyed, leaving them during that time does not involve a prohibition.

At times, wild plants grow in a vineyard, including wild grain stalks. Ideally, the owner should clear them once, either by mowing or by spraying. This both removes them and demonstrates that he does not want them there, even if they later grow back. Strictly speaking, however, he is not required to do so. At most, these plants have the status of animal fodder, which is prohibited only rabbinically, and in this case the vineyard owner does not want them.

If, however, he wants grasses to grow in his vineyard for the sake of the soil – to aerate and improve it – he is not required to mow or spray them. Since he is maintaining them for soil improvement rather than as animal fodder, they are not included in the Sages’ prohibition, which applies only to plants intended as animal feed.

[8]. This law applies to legumes as well. Vegetables, however, may continue producing new fruit even after some of their fruit has fully ripened. Therefore, vegetables remain subject to the prohibition until their final fruits have ripened.

According to R. Shimshon and Rosh, in their commentaries to Mishna, Kilayim 7:7, the prohibition of benefit does not depend on the grain and the vines reaching their forbidden stages at the same time. Each becomes forbidden by Torah law once it reaches its own forbidden stage, even if the other has not yet reached that stage. According to Rambam (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:14), however, the Torah prohibition takes effect only when both the grain and the grapes are at stages in which they can become forbidden. Rabbinically, though, even if only one of them has reached that stage, that species becomes forbidden. This is also the view of the later authorities (Levush YD 296:9–10; Tiferet Yisrael; Sha’arei Tzedek).

If one transgressed and sowed grain or vegetables in a vineyard, the grain or vegetables become forbidden as soon as they take root. The law is different when the plants were not sown directly in the vineyard: for example, if one carried a perforated pot containing grain or vegetables through a vineyard, or if such plants grew there on their own. According to Rambam (MT, Laws of Kilayim 5:23), the plants become forbidden once they increase by one part in two hundred. According to R. Shimshon and Rosh (Mishna, Kilayim 7:7–8), they become forbidden only after reaching one-third growth and then increasing by one part in two hundred. Since this dispute concerns Torah law, one must be stringent. This is also the ruling of SA YD 296:16–17, Levush, Sha’arei Tzedek, and Arukh ha-Shulḥan YD 296:29.

06. Required Distances for Vineyard Kilayim

The mitzva of kilayim requires that grain and vegetable species remain separate from grapevines. The Torah gave the Sages authority to determine, according to their judgment, what is considered mixed and what is not. What the Sages define as a prohibited mixture is therefore included in the Torah prohibition. There are three main situations in the laws of vineyard kilayim, listed here in ascending order of severity: 1) near a single vine; 2) near a vineyard; and 3) inside a vineyard.

A single vine: One who wishes to sow grain or vegetables near a single vine must keep them six generous tefaḥim away, approximately 47 cm. This is the area needed for the vine’s bed and the workspace around it. Grain or vegetables may not grow beneath the vine’s canes either. Thus, if a grain stalk grew beneath one of the canes, leaves, or clusters growing from the vine – even one hundred amot from the vine’s trunk – and the owner was negligent and did not uproot it, the stalk and the entire vine become forbidden for benefit, as explained above in section 2. If there is doubt whether the stalk is beneath the vine, its position is determined by a plumb line. Since vine canes often extend over a large area, one must ensure that no grain or vegetables grow beneath them at any point along their length.

Vines are commonly trained along poles or cords, with the canes expected to grow along them. The Sages therefore decreed that grain or vegetables may not grow even beneath the part of a pole or cord that the cane has not yet reached, since the cane is expected to extend there. After the fact, however, as long as the grain or vegetables were not actually beneath the vine itself, they do not become forbidden (MT, Laws of Kilayim 6:11–12, 15).

A vineyard is a grapevine planting arranged precisely according to the accepted method of cultivation. Since a vineyard has halakhic significance, one who sows grain or vegetables within four amot of it is considered to have sown them together with the vineyard, thereby violating the prohibition of kilayim. This distance was set at four amot, approximately 188 cm, because that was the space needed for vineyard work in earlier times. Vineyards were plowed with oxen, and at harvest time the grapes were brought from the vineyard to market by cart; both the oxen and the carts required this working space.

For vines to be considered a vineyard, they must form at least one of the following arrangements: two facing rows, with three vines in each row, as follows:

6 נקודות

or five vines arranged as “two opposite two, with one extending like a tail.” Rambam illustrates this second arrangement as follows:

R. Shimshon illustrates it this way:

If the vines do not form straight rows, even if there are many of them, they are treated a

individual vines.[9]

If one sows grain or vegetables within four amot of a vineyard, the portion of the vineyard equivalent to a small vineyard becomes forbidden – that is, the five vines closest to the kilayim, arranged in vineyard formation. If there are additional vines within four amot of the kilayim in any direction, they too become forbidden. One must also be careful with any vine cane that extends beyond the four-ama zone surrounding the vineyard. It is treated like a single vine, so grain or vegetables may not grow beneath it; if they do, both that vine and everything growing beneath the cane become forbidden.

An aris has the same status as a vineyard. An aris is formed by at least five vines planted in a straight row and trained along poles or wires, allowing them to receive more sun and air and produce more abundant, higher-quality grapes. If the kilayim are within four amot of the aris – whether near the vine trunks or near the poles or wires on which the vines are trained – the five vines facing the kilayim become forbidden.

A fence ten tefaḥim high, approximately 80 cm, separates the vineyard from the field. Once such a fence stands between them, one may sow grain or vegetables on the other side without any additional distance (MT, Laws of Kilayim 7:15). This is true even if the vine’s roots extend beneath the grain, because vineyard kilayim is defined by the visible appearance of mixture, not by the underground spread of roots. Since the fence makes the vineyard and field appear separate, the plants are not considered mixed.

Inside the vineyard: If one sowed kilayim inside a vineyard, or if kilayim grew there on its own and the owner was negligent and did not uproot it, the mixture is more apparent because it is inside the vineyard itself, and its laws are therefore far more severe. The affected area is measured by the reach of the roots’ nourishment: sixteen amot in every direction, plus an additional four amot for the vineyard’s work area. Thus, every vine within less than twenty amot of the kilayim becomes forbidden for benefit (MT, Laws of Kilayim 6:1–2).


[9]. It is clear that the Torah intended the Sages to define the parameters of the prohibition. The requirement to distance grain or vegetables four amot from a vineyard, which has the status of Torah law, was established by the Sages because vineyard work – including plowing with cattle and transporting the crop by cart – required four amot. The additional stringency regarding grain that grows inside a vineyard or within the empty space surrounding a vineyard, however, is rabbinic.

Regarding a single vine, Sifrei, Ki Tetze §230, Ramban, and Ran explain that the requirement to distance grain or vegetables six tefaḥim from a single vine is by Torah law. In other words, the measure established by the Sages for the work area of a single vine is binding by Torah law. By contrast, several Rishonim imply that the prohibition of vineyard kilayim applies only in an actual vineyard, and that the entire requirement to distance grain or vegetables from a single vine is rabbinic (She’iltot; Sefer ha-Ḥinukh §548). See the Herḥavot.

All measures of kilayim stated in tefaḥim use generous tefaḥim, as explained in SA YD 296:68. In the Herḥavot to Peninei Halakha: Sukkot 2:1, note 11, it is explained that we follow the view of Rashba, cited in SHT 363:60, that a generous tefaḥ adds approximately 1/48. Thus, an ama of six tefaḥim, normally 45.6 cm, is in practice 46.55 cm, which we rounded to 47 cm. Four amot were therefore rounded to 188 cm.

The Sages said that the distance between vineyard rows is between four and eight amot. Rambam implies that the same applies between one vine and another in the same row. Today, the accepted practice is to leave slightly more than four amot between vine rows, but only about three amot between vines in the same row. It seems that since this is now the optimal method of cultivation, such a planting is considered a vineyard. My teacher, R. Yisraeli, writes similarly. He adds that according to Rosh, even in the past there was no objection to planting the vines within a row at a distance of less than four amot from one another (Eretz Ḥemda, vol. 2, 7:1–3).

07. The Diaspora and Kilayim of Non-Jews

The Torah prohibition of seed kilayim and vineyard kilayim applies only in Eretz Yisrael. Regarding seed kilayim, the verse states: “You shall keep My statutes… You shall not sow your field with kilayim…” (Vayikra 19:19). Regarding vineyard kilayim, it states: “You shall not sow your vineyard with kilayim” (Devarim 22:9). The terms “your field” and “your vineyard” refer to the field and vineyard of the Jewish people, which are in Eretz Yisrael. Nevertheless, because vineyard kilayim is especially severe – its produce is forbidden both to eat and to derive benefit from – the Sages extended the prohibition to the Diaspora as well. They established, however, that in the Diaspora the prohibition applies only to cases that all authorities agree are forbidden by Torah law in Eretz Yisrael, both with respect to sowing and with respect to benefit (Kiddushin 39a).

Therefore, in the Diaspora, vineyard kilayim is prohibited only when one sows at one time a grape seed together with two other seed species that are themselves kilayim with one another – for example, two types of grain, two types of vegetables, or one vegetable species together with one grain species.

Although in Eretz Yisrael the Torah prohibition of vineyard kilayim applies even when one sows a single grain stalk next to a grapevine, and one who knowingly eats what grows there is liable for lashes, one is liable for sowing vineyard kilayim only in the narrower case: when he sows a grape seed together with two seed species that are kilayim with one another. Therefore, in the Diaspora, both the prohibition of sowing vineyard kilayim and the prohibition of deriving benefit from what grows apply only in that case. One may, however, sow grain in his vineyard in the Diaspora and eat what grows there (Rema YD 296:69).[10]

Although a non-Jew may sow kilayim in his vineyard in Eretz Yisrael, a Jew may not instruct him to do so (MT, Laws of Kilayim 8:13). Furthermore, by Torah law, a Jew may not derive benefit from grapes, grain, or vegetables that grew as kilayim in a non-Jew’s vineyard (Tosafot, Kiddushin 36b, s.v. kol; Rosh). Therefore, one may not buy grapes or vegetables from non-Jews near the vineyards where they were grown, since they may have been grown in violation of the prohibition. If one transgressed and bought them, he may not derive benefit from the produce. Since the doubt arose while the produce was still near its fixed place of origin, it is forbidden both to eat and to derive benefit from.

If, however, one buys in the market or in stores grapes or vegetables grown by non-Jews, then the doubt arose only after the produce had already separated from its fixed place. We therefore follow the majority, and the produce may be eaten. This ruling applies be-di’avad – for example, when one has already bought the produce and does not know its status, or when one is in a place with no kashrut-certified stores, and reaching such a store would require significant effort. If, however, there is a kashrut-certified store, one must avoid the doubt and buy there. Even when the concern is very remote, one must avoid entering a doubtful situation whenever possible. In addition, it is a mitzva to strengthen those who are careful in matters of kashrut. Moreover, when produce bears kashrut certification, terumot and ma’asrot will also have been separated properly, as explained above, 2:11.[11]


[10]. As we learned in note 1, authorities disagree about when one is liable for lashes for sowing vineyard kilayim in Eretz Yisrael. Rambam rules in accordance with R. Yoshiya: one is liable twice only if he sows a grape seed together with two seed species be-mapolat yad, in a single act of sowing. Regarding the Diaspora, the Sages said that practice follows R. Yoshiya’s view (Berakhot 22a; Kiddushin 39a).

According to Rambam (MT, Laws of Kilayim 8:13–14), there is no prohibition against sowing grain or vegetables in a vineyard in the Diaspora, but the produce that grows there is nevertheless forbidden for benefit. His reasoning is that since such produce is forbidden for benefit by Torah law in Eretz Yisrael, the Sages decreed that it is forbidden for benefit in the Diaspora as well. Rosh, Raavad, and Terumat ha-Deshen §194 disagree. In their view, whatever may be sown in a vineyard in the Diaspora may also be used if it grows there. Rema YD 296:69 rules this way. Since the dispute concerns rabbinic law, the halakha follows the lenient authorities.

According to Rosh, even Rambam agrees in principle. Rambam prohibited the produce only when one bought a vineyard that already contained vegetables, out of concern that they may have been sown be-mapolat yad.

[11]. The authorities permitted buying grapes and cucumbers from non-Jews despite the concern that they had been grown as prohibited kilayim, because most grapes and cucumbers are not grown that way. Since the doubt arose only after the produce had already left the non-Jew’s field, the rule of kol de-parish me-ruba parish applies: anything separated from a group is presumed to have come from the majority.

The authorities also allowed the produce on the basis of a safek sfeika, a double doubt. First, perhaps these grapes or vegetables were not grown in violation of kilayim at all. Second, even if they were grown near a vineyard, perhaps the halakha follows R. Yoshiya as understood by Rabbeinu Tam and Ri, discussed above in note 1. According to that view, unless the seeds were sown be-mapolat yad, there is no prohibition against eating the produce. Additional doubts were combined as well (Mabit 3:127; Maharitatz, Ḥadashot §31; Maharshdam; Keneset ha-Gedola; Birkei Yosef YD 296:1).

It seems to me that these leniencies may have applied specifically when the markets served primarily non-Jewish buyers, who formed the majority. Today, however, if it is known that non-Jews grow kilayim for sale in markets intended primarily for Jewish buyers, the kilayim may have the status of kavu’a – a fixed source – which is not nullified by the majority. When the prohibited produce became mixed in only incidentally, there is room to be lenient. But if kilayim produce is sold regularly in specific places, one may not buy produce there as long as there is doubt whether it is kilayim. Certainly, kashrut agencies that seek a higher standard must be careful about this.

08. The Reason for the Mitzva

The prohibition of vineyard kilayim is unique. In addition to the prohibition against mixing grain or vegetables with a grapevine, the produce that grows from such a mixture is itself forbidden, both to eat and to derive benefit from, as it says: “You shall not sow your vineyard with kilayim, lest the full yield – the seed you sow and the produce of the vineyard – become consecrated” (Devarim 22:9). Here, “become consecrated” does not refer to positive holiness. It means that the produce has been designated and set aside for a particular purpose. Usually, such designation is holy and exalted; at times, however, people dedicate themselves to sin, as in the case of a prostitute, who is called a kedesha (Bereishit 38:21). So too, the fruit of vineyard kilayim, having been set apart through sin, becomes consecrated to impurity and is forbidden to the entire Jewish people.

Vineyard kilayim may be treated so severely because it involves the vineyard, and wine has extraordinary power – for good and for harm. On the one hand, song and blessing are recited over wine. On the other hand, it can degrade a person and cast him into the depths of sin. For this reason, a special mitzva of nezirut was established in relation to wine: one who fears that wine may pull his heart toward evil, or hinder his growth in holiness, takes a vow to abstain from it. Indeed, an entire tractate of the Talmud is devoted to this subject: Nazir.

Since wine can sway a person’s judgment, the Torah forbids kohanim to drink wine while serving in the Temple. Similarly, one who has drunk wine may not pray (Peninei Halakha: Prayer 5:11). This same concern helps explain why the Torah treated vineyard kilayim more severely than other forms of kilayim: anything connected to wine requires special care. Wine should be used for the joy of a mitzva, not for unrestrained indulgence or escape from responsibility (see Peninei Halakha: Berakhot 7:1–2).

There is another dimension as well: grain, legumes, and vegetables are essential to human survival. Although eating them does not involve especially intense desire, a person cannot live without them. Therefore, one must work diligently to cultivate them and eat them regularly. Wine, by contrast, is not necessary for survival, but it brings great joy and is meant to serve the joy of a mitzva. This helps explain why blurring the boundary between these two categories is dangerous. If a person treats wine like grain, drinking it as a regular staple, he may become enslaved to his desire and fall into alcoholism. Even if he does not become addicted, excessive daily drinking causes wine to lose its special role in the joy of a mitzva. Conversely, if a person treats grain like a vine, as though it were not essential, he will become lazy, and thorns will grow in his field instead of grain (see Shemen Ra’anan, p. 333, citing Maran Rav Kook).

Chapter Contents

Peninei Halakha We use cookies to ensure the website functions properly and improve user experience. You can choose which types of cookies to enable.
Cookie Selection