14. Shemita

Nearly all Tanna’im agree that about 150 years before the destruction of the First Temple, when the king of Assyria exiled the tribes of Reuven, Gad, and half of Menashe, shemita and yovel ceased to apply by Torah law. These mitzvot apply by Torah law only when Israel dwells properly in its Land, with the majority of each tribe in its inheritance (Arakhin 32b; Peninei Halakha: Shemita Ve-yovel 5:4, note 3). Thus, when the Men of the Great Assembly sanctified the Land with respect to shemita and yovel, the conditions for Torah obligation had not yet been restored. During the Second Temple period, therefore, the Jewish people were obligated to observe them by rabbinic enactment. That sanctification remained effective for the future as well: when Israel returns to its Land, each tribe to its inheritance, shemita and yovel will again apply by Torah law, without any need to sanctify the Land again.

Even after the destruction of the Second Temple, the rabbinic obligation to observe shemita was not nullified. True, uncertainty emerged regarding which year is the seventh year. In addition, some Rishonim maintain that once the court that sanctified the months and counted the years no longer functioned – about 300 years after the destruction of the Second Temple – the obligation of shemita ceased as well. According to them, observing shemita today is proper only as a pious practice (Razah and Raavad). In practice, however, the overwhelming majority of Rishonim and Aḥaronim maintain that even today one must observe shemita by rabbinic enactment, following the accepted count transmitted to us (Peninei Halakha: Shemita Ve-yovel 5:6–7, notes 5–6).

One must observe shemita in gevul olei Mitzrayim and Syria as well. However, the prohibition of sefiḥim – produce that grew on its own during shemita – was enacted specifically for gevul olei Bavel, not for gevul olei Mitzrayim or Syria (Rambam, Sefer Mitzvot Gadol, Sefer ha-Ḥinukh, and others). Some authorities are even more lenient and maintain that in gevul olei Mitzrayim and Syria, shemita produce may be eaten even after the time of bi’ur. According to another view, produce grown there does not have the sanctity of shemita at all. [17]


[17]. The overwhelming majority of authorities maintain that the prohibition against agricultural work during shemita applies even in gevul olei Mitzrayim and Syria. According to this view, the only distinction between gevul olei Bavel and the rest of the Land concerns the prohibition of sefiḥim (Rambam, Sefer Mitzvot Gadol, Sefer ha-Ḥinukh, Kaftor Va-feraḥ, Tiferet Yisrael, Nivḥar Mi-kesef, Ma’amar Mordekhai, Mishpetei Eretz, and many others). Among these authorities, some maintain that the law of bi’ur does not apply to produce grown there (R. Shimshon of Sens and Ramban). Others maintain that produce grown there does not have the sanctity of shemita at all (Mahariṭ, the Vilna Gaon, and Pe’at ha-Shulḥan). A few Rishonim maintain that outside gevul olei Bavel there is no prohibition against agricultural work during shemita – Rabbeinu Gershom, Rashi, Meiri, Ḥullin 6b, and Tashbetz 3:199. This view, however, was not accepted by the other authorities. For that reason, I did not cite it in Peninei Halakha: Shemita Ve-yovel 5:8, note 7.
Peninei Halakha We use cookies to ensure the website functions properly and improve user experience. You can choose which types of cookies to enable.
Cookie Selection